Legal Opinion
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 23, 1940No. 1751PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOINET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs’ order to show cause why a temporary injunction should not issue herein having come on to be heard, and the Court having heard arguments of counsel for and against the same, now, therefore, pursuant to Rule 52 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, this Court hereby makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Findings of Fact.
On November 8, 1938, the National Labor Relations Board issued a decision and direction of election in the matter of Consumers Power Company and International Brotherhood of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lumber & Sawmill Workers v. MillisSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Inland Empire District Council, Lumber and Sawmill Workers Union, Lewiston, Idaho v. MillisSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Madden v. Brotherhood & Union of Transit Employees of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- Klein v. HerrickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Wilson Employees' Representation Plan v. Wilson & Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1943