Legal Opinion

Duimo v. Arbuckle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 1915No. Appeal No. 1; Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Separate appeals by the defendant, William A. Jamison, from two orders of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 4th day of December, 1914.

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, J.:

The defendant William A. Jamison appeals from two orders of the Special Term. One is from an order granting plaintiff’s motion for judgment against the appellant by default, based upon the assumption that the appellant has, through certain stipulations made by the attorneys for his codefendant, entered a general appearance and is in default in failing to plead. The other order denies appellant’s motion to vacate and set aside said stipulations in so far as the same are claimed to constitute a general appearance for him, upon the ground that they were unauthorized and that they were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Paine Lumber Co. v. GalbraithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Couch v. MulhaneThe Superior Court of New York City · 1882
  3. Myers v. PrefontaineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amusement Securities Corp. v. Academy Pictures Distributing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. Robinson v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Court Square Building, Inc. v. HarrisCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API