Legal Opinion

Douglass v. Orman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 22, 1928No. 8 Div. 47PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

The case has been elaborately argued in the brief of counsel for appellant on this application for certiorari to the Court of Appeals. It has had all due attention in this court. Petitioner insists that the Court of Appeals has erred in several particulars in its statement of the facts shown by the record. As to that, it must suffice to say that this court has uniformly refused to investigate disputed questions of fact on applications for the writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91. However, we think we may notice one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. MinderhoutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Washington v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Couch v. Terry's Adm'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  4. Broughton v. WimberlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Drummond v. DrummondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Scott v. McGriffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Gafford v. TittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Gafford v. TittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Scott v. McGriffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API