Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Thomas, Warden

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1930No. 22133PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is a proceeding in habeas corpus, begun in this court by Frank Reeves, a convict in the Ohio state penitentiary, against the warden of that institution; it being claimed that the applicant is unlawfully deprived of his liberty.

The facts appearing of record are that Frank Reeves was found guilty of the crime of grand larceny by a jury in the court of common pleas of Meigs county, Ohio, said verdict being rendered on May 4, 1925. A certified copy of the sentence imposed, in so far as the same is material here, reads:

“The said Frank Reeves having been found guilty, it is therefore the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ThorpeOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. O'Neill v. Thomas, WardenOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Blake v. SacksOhio Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API