Legal Opinion

Greater Leasing, Inc. v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1981No. 61800PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The parties to this litigation entered into a written lease/ purchase agreement involving an automobile which was eventually repossessed and sold after a series of defaults. The appellant’s complaint sought damages for the difference between the contract and sale price plus costs of sale and attorney fees. The case was tried before a jury and a verdict was directed in favor of the defendant Hill. The plaintiff appeals.

1. “Where parties, in the course of the execution of a contract, depart from its terms and pay or receive money under such departure, before either can…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION OF GEORGIASupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Verner v. McLartySupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  3. Curl v. Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  4. Hayes v. FIDELITY ACCEPTANCE CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. WRENN BROTHERSCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. United States v. SalzilloDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API