Legal Opinion

Brugman v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1985PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We need not decide whether the proceedings before the Medical Board warrant a departure from the general rule of issue preclusion. The plaintiff had a full and fair opportunity to be heard. He had no occasion for cross-examination; his was the only evidence before the board. He admitted on argument that he had no other evidence to present and was unaware of any evidence that might be discoverable. The issue of the cause of his medical condition is thus precluded by the board’s determination.

Chief…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Allied Chemical v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Giakoumelos v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. Giakoumelos v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. Browning Avenue Realty Corp. v. RubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Auqui v. Seven Thirty One Limited PartnershipNew York Court of Appeals · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API