Phillips v. McNeice
Supreme Court of Georgia
Counsel for plaintiff in error insisted that the acknowledgment of service cured the defect suggested. The acknowledgment was as follows:
1Opinion of the Court
1. Where a bill of exceptions was certified on January 24th, 1873, and service perfected on Pebruary, 17th, 1873, the writ of error will be dismissed. (R.)
2. A party being prejudiced in his rights by the action of the Judge after the presentation to him of the bill of exceptions for his signature, under circumstances which may be remedied by the writ of mandamus, must make his application for said writ on or before the third day of the term of this Court next after the the bill of exceptions is tendered, or he will not he heard. Rule 29. (R.)
3. An aekowledgment of “due and legal service” of…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Moss v. BurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896