Legal Opinion

Garibay v. Barrett Business Services

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 18, 1997No. 94-14940; CA A94186PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, contending that the Board erred in affirming the administrative law judge (ALJ) and holding that his claim for carpal tunnel syndrome is not compensable. We agree with claimant that the Board erred and further hold that the claim is the responsibility of Barrett Business Services (Barrett). Accordingly, we reverse and remand the case for acceptance and processing of the claim by Barrett.

Claimant moved to Oregon from Mexico in 1981. His first language is Spanish, and the record shows that he does not read or write English.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garibay v. Barrett Business ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Farmers Insurance Group v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Gosda v. J.B. Hunt TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. RLC Industries v. Sun Studs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API