Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vasconi v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 3, 1991Published

1DissentPollock, J.

Until today an insured could change the beneficiary on an insurance policy only by notifying the insurer in accordance with the policy or by substantially complying with policy provisions. The majority rejects that rule. It holds that after the death of a divorced insured, the named beneficiary, his former wife, may be deprived of the insurance proceeds because her lawyer did not specifically protect her in their property settlement agreement. I would leave so drastic a change to the Legislature. The rule accomplishes little except to engender uncertainty and spawn litigation. Consequently, I…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Walker Rogge, Inc. v. Chelsea Title & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Washington Construction Co., Inc. v. SpinellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  3. In the Matter of the Community Medical Center A/K/A All Souls' Hospital, Debtor, the Community Medical Center A/K/A All Souls Hospital, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Mullenax v. National Reserve Life Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Bersch v. VanKleeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API