Legal Opinion

Foster v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 14, 1931No. 4369PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALSCHULER, Circuit Judge.

The only question which this appeal presents is as to the validity of the Act of Con-egress of March 2, 1929, commonly known as the Jones Act (27 USCA §§ 91, 92). The 'contention is that, the proviso of the act de-j prives defendants of the right of trial by * jury, because the grade of offenses as therein [specified is to be determined by the court and . not by a jury. The act, after specifying for ' certain violations of the National Prohibition Law a maximum penalty of five years’ imprisonment or $10,000- fine, or both, continues : “Provided, That it is the intent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gurera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  2. McElvogue v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  3. Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  4. United States v. KentDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  2. Olivito v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  3. Kopp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  4. Pace v. AderholdDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API