Legal Opinion

Van Ingen v. Jewish Hospital

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action for negligence.

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

The plaintiff was injured while riding in an automobile on a public highway. This machine was run into by an ambulance belonging to the defendant and in charge of its servant. The plaintiff has had a verdict, the jury finding that the negligence of the defendant’s servant, in charge of the ambulance, was the cause of the collision. The verdict is amply supported by the proof and is proper, unless the defendant is immune from liability. That question arises on motions made to dismiss the complaint or direct a verdict for the defendant, decision on which was reserved.

The claim of the defendant…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Maxmilian v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Moynihan v. ToddMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Hover v. BarkhoofCommission of Appeals · 1870
  5. Hordern v. . Salvation ArmyNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van Ingen v. Jewish HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  2. Sheehan v. North Country Community HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API