Legal Opinion

Foster Rich v. Ralph Shrader

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 24, 2016No. 14-55484PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLOCK, District Judge:

Foster Rich appeals the district court’s dismissal of his breach-of-contract and Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) claims against Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (“BAH”), Ralph Shrader, and Joseph Garner, and its denial of his motion for leave to amend the complaint. We affirm and write principally to address the proper standard for evaluating what qualifies as an employee pension benefit plan under ERISA.

I

Rich began working for BAH in 1987. On September 4, 2003, Rich’s performance was evaluated by BAH. Ultimately, Rich’s evaluation resulted in a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jack Allen v. City of Beverly HillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Paulsen v. CNF INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Godofredo Hernandez v. Spacelabs Medical Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Kaplan v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Pasternack v. ShraderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. Dan Wilson v. Safelite Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. Kuhbier v. McCartney, Verrino & Rosenberry Vested Producer PlanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  4. (PC) Maraglino v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (PC) Miller v. SotoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API