Legal Opinion

People ex rel. McGoldrick v. Riggs

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Before the plaintiff can obtain the order sought he must show that the defendants have engaged or are about to engage in acts or practices which constitute or will constitute a violation of the law. “ A temporary prohibitive injunction will not be granted where a substantial issue exists as to the facts upon which the right to relief depends ”. (People ex rel. McGoldrick v. Follette, 199 Misc. 492, 497.) The defendants deny that they are engaged or are about to engage in any acts which will constitute a violation of the law. They contend that there has been no legal maximum rent established…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. . Childs Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Carpenter v. . StilwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. Lee v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1946
  4. People ex rel. McGoldrick v. FolletteNew York Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blank v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API