Legal Opinion
Hannan v. Hardee
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 12, 1934No. 5934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
An appeal from a decree dismissing a bill of complaint for want of substance.
The appellant, Patrick F. Hannan, was plaintiff in the lower court, and the Federal American National Bank & Trust Company of Washington, hereinafter called the bank, was the principal defendant. In the bill it was alleged in substance that on March 31, 1931, the William A. Hill Company, a corporation, executed-and delivered to plaintiff its several promissory notes in the aggregate sum of $4,500; that afterwards plaintiff indorsed and discounted the notes with the bank, which thereby became…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Scott v. NeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Cates v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Huntley v. KingmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wynne v. Boone Boone v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Community Credit Union Services, Inc. v. Federal Express Services Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Hannan v. HardeeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
- Wynne v. Boone Boone v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951