Legal Opinion

Crumpacker v. Spalding

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1961No. 12PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CULPEPPER, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Maurice L. Crum-packer, brought this suit to be recognized as an adopted child and forced heir of Milo Spalding and Dora H. Spalding and as such, the owner of an undivided one-sixth interest in their respective estates.

On October 5, 1914, Milo Spalding and his wife, Dora Spalding, appeared before a Notary Public and two witnesses and signed an act in which they declared that “they have adopted and do by these presents formally adopt as their own child, Maurice Lorane Crumpacker, who is nine years of age, whose parents are to appearers unknown, * * * This…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Green v. PaulSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  2. Succession of PizzilloSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  3. Succession of PizzatiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  4. Brand v. MornhinvegSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. Owles v. JacksonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crumpacker v. SpaldingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API