Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 5, 1889PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Case 24 — APPEAL PROM HARLAN CIRCUIT COURT. While the indictment contains some surplusage, it contains all of the elements necessary to make it a good indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

•OHIEE JUSTICE LEWIS

delivered the opinion op the court.

The offense charged in the indictment against the accused is forgery, alleged to have been committed as follows: ‘ ‘ The said Z. B. Wilson did, on the 30th day of September, 1886, in the county of Harlan and State of Kentucky, unlawfully and willfully and feloniously, and with the fraudulent intent and for the purpose of defrauding the Commonwealth of Kentucky and Harlan county out of the vacant and unappropriated lands belonging to said county, did make, forge, utter and put a snrvey plat and certificate in the name of B. P. Engle, which…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Moore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  2. Quick Service Box Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  3. Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. Peoples BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. In re TerrettMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Robinson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API