Legal Opinion

Adair v. Crepps

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1947No. 6809PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HILDEBRANT, J.

The Municipal Court of Cincinnati, by dismissing the action at the close of Plaintiffs’ evidence, held it had no jurisdiction in a forcible entry and detainer action where the defendant was in possession as lessee under a lease containing a privilege of purchase clause, together with a forfeiture clause providing for re-entry and repossession by lessor on breach of the covenant to pay rent which is the breach alleged here.

The Court stated in its finding that its conclusion was based on Bevard v Brucker, 43 Oh Ap 294, wherein is cited The Cullen & Vaughn Co. v The…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Silver Surprize, Inc. v. Sunshine Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Kuhn v. GriffinOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Smith v. EtlingOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Silver Surprize, Inc. v. Sunshine Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API