Legal Opinion

Brodina v. Vranek

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is a contest between a claimant under a threshing lien alleged to have been perfected within the provisions of § 6855, Comp. Laws, 1913, and claimants under two separate chattel mortgages. The only question in the case is as to the sufficiency of the lien statement filed by the plaintiff. The case was tried upon stipulated facts and resulted in a judgment for the defendants, the Bank of Bark Iliver and the First State Bank of Lankin. The trial court held that the lien statement was insufficient and that the plaintiff, therefore, did not have a threshing lien upon the grain raised upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Monarch Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Moher v. RasmussonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Martin v. HawthornNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Hiam v. Andrews Grain Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Groth v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Murie v. National Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Carlson v. Powers Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API