Legal Opinion

Oelbaum v. Winer

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

on for an injunction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The plaintiffs seek to enjoin the defendants, first, from interfering with the water pipe supplying water to their portion of the building in - question, and, second, from preventing them and their employees from passing through the ground floor of the premises in question to the freight elevator. The plaintiffs are the lessees of the entire building in question, which consists of a basement, a ground floor and five upper factory lofts. The basement and ground floor and the first loft are occupied by the defendants for stable and laundry purposes under a sublease for a term of years from the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paine v. . ChandlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Bauman v. WagnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Burlew v. HunterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. Hill v. BernheimerNew York Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oelbaum v. WinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. People v. Raeder, New York County Courts1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API