Legal Opinion
People v. Bernard
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 28, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was convicted, upon a jury verdict, of four counts of robbery in the first degree and various other offenses. Prior to sentencing, the defendant moved, pro se, to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30 on the ground that a certain witness was not called to testify at trial. At the sentencing hearing, the Supreme Court asked defense counsel if he was adopting the defendant’s motion. Defense counsel responded, in sum and substance, that he had reviewed the motion and did not adopt it. He added that if he were to adopt the motion, he would *953have had to indicate that he had “a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. BetschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. BurtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. GruttadauriaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. RosenbauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BernardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. SondsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. BernardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. FreireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018