Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Youngs

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Boor County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtOetoN, J.

The plaintiff’s first cause of action is for logs sold to the defendant in the winter of 1889 and 1890; the second, for work and labor of plaintiff’s men and use of teams; and third, for goods, wares, and merchandise, board of men, team-work, and for money paid. The defendant, besides a denial of the several causes of action, alleges in his answer a full settlement thereof and full payment be*108fore the commencement of the suit. The main question in the case is such settlement.

It appears that the parties, previous to that time, had extensive dealings with each other in logs, lumber, merchandise,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kirby v. CorningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Friederick v. PerkinsonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. 2109 Brandywine, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Doeller v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  3. Jacksonville Terminal Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  4. Wong Kwai v. DominisHawaii Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API