Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Schwartz

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPette, J.

Motion by the defendant for various relief with respect to the three causes of action set forth in plaintiff’s amended complaint disposed of as follows:

That branch of the motion which seeks a separate statement of claimed multiple causes of action set forth in the first and second causes of action is denied. The allegations concerning the “ understanding and agreement ” claimed to have been entered into on or about July 27, 1953, are relevant only as the basis for the conversion charged in the first cause of action and the reimbursement of the rent of the apartment which is the gravamen of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Schmelzel v. SchmelzelNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Hettich v. HettichNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Dempsey v. DempseyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Magrill v. MagrillAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
  2. Leitman v. LeitmanNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API