Legal Opinion

Pereida-Alba v. Coursey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 29, 2012No. CV090464; A146174PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment granting post-conviction relief to petitioner, contending that the post-conviction court erred in concluding that petitioner’s trial counsel in his criminal case had provided him with constitutionally deficient legal representation by failing to request a jury instruction on a lesser-included offense. We affirm.

Petitioner was charged with first-degree robbery, ORS 164.415,1 for using a dangerous weapon to prevent or overcome resistance in the course of committing theft. First-degree robbery is a Measure 11 offense that is subject to a mandatory 90-month sentence.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. MoroneyOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. MosesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. LeckenbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Trotter v. SantosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Green v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Pereida-Alba v. CourseyOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Bostwick v. CourseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Flores-Salazar v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. Green v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API