Legal Opinion

People v. Ceja

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 6, 1995No. 94SC393PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

We granted certiorari to determine whether the court of appeals erred by holding that the prosecution must prove that a defendant knowingly possessed a “usable quantity” to obtain a conviction for possession of cocaine. People v. Ceja, No. 92CA1768 (Colo.App. May 5, 1994) (not selected for publication). We hold that section 18-18-105(l)(a), 8B C.R.S. (1986) does not require the prosécution to prove that the defendant possessed a usable quantity of cocaine. Rather, the prosecution must prove that the defendant knowingly possessed some quantity of controlled substance. Possession of a usable…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Charnes v. LobatoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Casias v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  3. Moore v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  4. Duran v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Mickens v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. WarrenColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Richardson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. Dep't of Nat. Res. v. 5 Star Feedlot, IncSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  4. People v. RichardsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State of Colorado, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES and Parks and Wildlife Commission and Division of Parks and Wildlife v. 5 STAR FEEDLOT, INC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API