People v. Ceja
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis
We granted certiorari to determine whether the court of appeals erred by holding that the prosecution must prove that a defendant knowingly possessed a “usable quantity” to obtain a conviction for possession of cocaine. People v. Ceja, No. 92CA1768 (Colo.App. May 5, 1994) (not selected for publication). We hold that section 18-18-105(l)(a), 8B C.R.S. (1986) does not require the prosécution to prove that the defendant possessed a usable quantity of cocaine. Rather, the prosecution must prove that the defendant knowingly possessed some quantity of controlled substance. Possession of a usable…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Charnes v. LobatoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Casias v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
- Moore v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Duran v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Mickens v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. WarrenColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Richardson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Dep't of Nat. Res. v. 5 Star Feedlot, IncSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- People v. RichardsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- State of Colorado, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES and Parks and Wildlife Commission and Division of Parks and Wildlife v. 5 STAR FEEDLOT, INC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.