Dimmick v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was charged by indictment with the commission of certain crimes against the laws of the United States. The indictment contained four counts, on the first and fourth of which the jury impaneled to try the case returned a verdict of guilty, upon which a judgment sentencing him to imprisonment in the state prison was entered. The second and third counts of the indictment are eliminated from consideration by the verdict of not guilty in respect to the third and the action of the court below in sustaining a demurrer to the second count. The first count…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Locke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Claassen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Bond v. DustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Clifton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- Snyder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ercoli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- United States v. Percy Branker, Grover Cooper, John L. Lacey, David Lopez, Charles Moore and John A. Ross, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States Ex Rel. Thompson v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
- United States Ex Rel. Brensilber v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Salomon R. Sandez, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.