Legal Opinion
Zelnick v. Small
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 24, 2000PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Clinton, granting the petitioner’s application for a variance to allow 32 horses to be stabled on his property only to the extent of granting a variance allowing 23 horses to be stabled, the appeal is from a *528judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (LaCava, J.), dated February 23, 1999, which, inter alla, granted the petition, annulled the determination, and directed the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Clinton to issue the variance for 32 horses.
Ordered that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Ernalex Construction Realty Corp. v. City of Glen CoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Siegel v. TangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Kennedy v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by10 opinions
- Eastport Alliance v. LofaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- EMB Enterprises, LLC v. Town of RiverheadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Lamar Advertising of Penn, LLC v. Village of MarathonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Roanoke Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Action Redi-Mix Corp. v. DavisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.