Legal Opinion

Sturtevant v. Sturtevant

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1918PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga county.

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

In the court of common pleas of Cuyahoga county the defendant in error, Florence Elizabeth Sturtevant, recovered from the plaintiffs in error a verdict and judgment in the sum of $15,000. In her petition she claimed that the plaintiffs in error, who are her father-in-law and her mother-in-law, alienated the affections of her husband, James W. Sturtevant, Jr., causing him to abandon her. The case was tried at great length and very bitterly contested.

*133It is claimed by the plaintiffs in error that 'there is error apparent upon the face of the record, which requires a reversal of the judgment…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ass'n of N.J. Rifle & Pistol Clubs, Inc. v. Attorney Gen. N.J.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  2. Wallen v. GormanOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Association of New Jersey Rifl v. Attorney General New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  4. Association of New Jersey Rifl v. Attorney General New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  5. Vaughn v. United States Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API