Legal Opinion

American Key Corp. v. Cumberland Associates

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided April 30, 1984No. Civ. A. No. C80-776APublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FORRESTER, District Judge.

This action is before the court on plaintiffs’ February 13 motion for a review of the bill of costs taxed against them and plaintiffs’ February 21 motion for a review of the supplemental costs taxed against them by defendant Sears. Both motions are brought under Rule 54(d), Fed.R.Civ.P., which states in pertinent part:

Except when express provision therefor is made either in a statute of the United States or in these rules, costs shall be allowed as of course to the prevailing party unless the court otherwise directs ____ Costs may be taxed by the clerk on one…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Marrian Kolesar and Andrew Kolesar, Her HusbandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  2. County of Suffolk v. Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Independence Tube Corp. v. Copperweld Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  4. George R. Hall, Inc. v. Superior Trucking Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
  5. Jeffries v. Georgia Residential Finance AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Corsair Asset Management, Inc. v. MoskovitzDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1992
  2. Fulton Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Atlanta v. American InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1991
  3. Goodwall Construction Co. v. Beers Construction Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1992
  4. Fogleman v. Aramco (Arabian American Oil Co.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Johnson v. MorthamDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API