Legal Opinion

Barash v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 24, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.

Plaintiff’s judgment against the defendant board of education is predicated upon a breach of contract. The breach asserted is the defendant’s refusal to pay plaintiff for extra work *250performed and materials furnished. The defendant denies such breach and claims that no extra work was done or required and that it has paid plaintiff the full contract price.

The contract called for certain fireproof or prevention work on Public School 94, New York city, which had been ordered by the fire department. The work was to be done on certain windows opening on a light shaft. The windows were to be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sweet v. . MorrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Lentilhon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Dean v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Lentilhon v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Neidlinger v. Onward Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dowd v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  2. Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API