Locklear v. Locklear
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Defendant presents four assignments of error. Defendant argues that the trial court erred in classifying certain property as marital property, that the trial court erred in valuing a closely held corporation, and that the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not adequate to support its unequal distribution of marital property. We hold that the trial court’s order is erroneous and, accordingly, we vacate and remand.
Defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s valuation of Lumbee Trucking. Primarily, he argues that the court’s findings of fact were too…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Wade v. WadeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Poore v. PooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ullom v. UllomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Davis v. SineathCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- In Re BrittUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2007
- Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014