State v. Lindsey

The appellant was found guilty by a jury of the crime of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and has appealed from a judgment on the verdict.

There can be no question, indeed none is presented, that there was abundant evidence to justify the verdict.

Several assignments of error are presented upon the alleged prejudicial conduct of the deputy prosecuting attorney in the trial of the case which it is claimed calls for a reversal. They refer to three questions asked on the cross-examination of Mrs. Keck while testifying on behalf of the appellant, and a statement made by the attorney in his…