Legal Opinion

Jessie L. WATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 9, 1984No. 83-7391PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

On appeal from the district court’s affirmance of a denial of disability benefits, Jessie L. Watson argues the determination that she could return to her past work as a collator is not supported by substantial evidence and that Watson’s pain was not properly considered. We affirm.

Watson, 53 years old at the time of the decision, has a third grade education and is unable to read well. Her past work experience has been collator in a printing company and packager and assembler of automotive and missile parts.

Watson filed an application for disability benefits because of impairments resulting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Malcolm M. Gaultney, Jr. v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Howard Y. Fortenberry v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Castel v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Ann M. Sheldon v. Michael J. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Mary L. Johnson v. JoAnne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Allen v. Social Security Administration, CommissionerDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
  5. Baird v. Social Security Administration, CommissionerDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API