Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Spillman v. Dunbar State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1930No. 26978PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is a controversy between creditors of an insolvent state bank and the receiver over the allowance of a claim.

In a proceeding by the state of Nebraska to wind up the affairs of the Dunbar State Bank, Henry G. Seyfer, James Murray, Earl Seyfer and H. S. Westbrook intervened, filed a claim for $5,000 and pleaded a preference requiring payment out of funds in the hands of the receiver, if sufficient, but, if insufficient, demanding payment of the remainder out of the bank guaranty fund. The receiver contested the claim. Upon a trial of the issues raised by the pleadings, the district court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCarter v. LaveryNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Deines v. SchwindNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Heesch v. SnyderNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State ex rel. Hoctor v. TrainorNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Schlanbusch v. SchlanbuschNebraska Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Smrha v. General American Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Best & Co. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  3. City of Crete v. County of SalineNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API