Legal Opinion

Uremovich v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 1989No. Nos. 645, 646 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, Judge.

George F. Uremovich and Larry Spahr file appeals, now consolidated, from respective State Ethics Commission decisions that each man used his position as an elected supervisor of Union Township, a second class township, to obtain financial gain in violation of section 3(a) of the State Ethics Act.1

Specifically, the commission found, after a hearing, that, although both supervisors also serve as township roadmasters, each received township-paid life and health insurance benefits,2 which terminate upon retirement, without the affirmative approval of the township board of auditors.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yocabet v. STATE ETHICS COMM.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. McCutcheon v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Appeal of Auditors v. KomaneckyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. In Re Appeal of Auditor's Report of Muncy Creek TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Summers v. COM., STATE ETHICS COM'NCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. R.H. v. State Ethics CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API