Uremovich v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CRAIG, Judge.
George F. Uremovich and Larry Spahr file appeals, now consolidated, from respective State Ethics Commission decisions that each man used his position as an elected supervisor of Union Township, a second class township, to obtain financial gain in violation of section 3(a) of the State Ethics Act.1
Specifically, the commission found, after a hearing, that, although both supervisors also serve as township roadmasters, each received township-paid life and health insurance benefits,2 which terminate upon retirement, without the affirmative approval of the township board of auditors.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Yocabet v. STATE ETHICS COMM.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- McCutcheon v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Appeal of Auditors v. KomaneckyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- In Re Appeal of Auditor's Report of Muncy Creek TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Summers v. COM., STATE ETHICS COM'NCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- R.H. v. State Ethics CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996