Legal Opinion

Allen v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 2011No. 46A04-1106-PC-353PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATHIAS, Judge.

Mario Allen appeals the LaPorte Superi- or Court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Although Allen agrees with the post-conviction court’s finding that he was denied the assistance of appellate counsel, he argues that the proper remedy is a new trial. The State also agrees with the post-conviction court’s finding that Allen was denied the assistance of appellate counsel, but claims that the proper remedy is simply to permit Allen to proceed with the direct appeal that he was denied. We agree with the State and reinstate Allen’s direct appeal.

Facts and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. John Castellanos v. United States of America, Kevin B. Streete v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mario A. Allen v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Brown v. SuperintendentDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2014
  3. George A. Foote v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Mario Allen v. Wendy Knight, Superintendent of Correctional Industrial Facility (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API