Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Pentagon Capital Management PLC
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 1, 2010No. 08 Civ. 3324Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Pentagon Capital Management PLC (“PCM”) and Lewis Chester (“Chester”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) and Pentagon Special Purpose Fund, Ltd. (“PSPF” or the “Relief Defendant”) have moved in limine pursuant to Rules 801(d)(2), 803(8) and 201, Fed.R.Evid., to determine the admissibility of congressional testimony of Steven Cutler pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2), 803(8) and 201.
For the reasons set forth below, the motion as to admissibility is granted with leave granted to the plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to renew its relevance…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bridgeway Corporation v. Citibank, Doing Business as Citicorp N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Litton Systems, Inc., Litton Business Telephone Systems, Inc., Litton Business Systems, Inc., and Litton Industries Credit Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees- Cross v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Western Electric Company, Inc., Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., New York Telephone Company, Inc., New Jersey Bell Telephone Company, Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, the Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, Defendants-Appellants-Cross Litton Systems, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Meriwether v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Paolitto v. John Brown E.&C., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.