Legal Opinion

People v. Santiago Vázquez

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Decided December 14, 1967No. CR-66-327Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Santana Becerra

Appellant was convicted of the crime against nature, subsequent offense. Section 278 of the Penal Code, as amended by Act No. 42 of May 4, 1943 provides:

“Every person who is guilty of the infamous crime against nature, committed with mankind or with any animal, is punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary for a minimum term of one (1) and a maximum term of ten (10) years.”

Appellant maintains in his first assignment of error that he has been deprived of his liberty without due process of law because § 278, by virtue of which he was convicted, does not define an offense, but it provides a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Blake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. People v. ErwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  5. People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API