Munk v. Anderson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the county court of Winnebago county: C. D. OlevelaNd, Judge. Action to revive and foreclose a mortgage, and for other equitable relief. The facts necessary to an understanding of this appeal are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, J.
The judgment appealed from ivas duly perfected on the 6th day of September, 1892. Notice of the entry of such judgment was served on appellants’ attorneys on the 8th day of September, 1892. Notice of the appeal was served on respondents’ attorneys on the 16th day of August, 1891. The undertaking for costs was served on the 16th day of December, 1894, more than two years after the *28entry of judgment. No deposit of money was made in lieu of such undertaking, nor was there any waiver, in any way, of such undertaking or deposit. Such being the record, the respondents’ attorneys moved the court to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Herrick v. Racine Warehouse & Dock Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Parker v. McAvoyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Burger v. SinclairNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Richter v. Standard Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Ady v. BarnettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Haessly v. SecorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.