Legal Opinion · Dissent

Triton Coal Co. v. Husman, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1993No. 92-55, 92-56Published

1DissentCardine, Justice

with whom THOMAS, Justice, joins.

Husman sued Triton Coal Company to recover loss and damage resulting from breach of contract because of Triton’s failure to pay for overburden moved and for negligent misrepresentation of soil and water conditions which caused Husman to enter into the contract causing damage. On July 9, 1990, the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of Triton and against Husman, stating:

[T]he Court finds that there are no genuine issues as to any material fact and the Defendant [Triton] is entitled to Judgment as a matter of law on all claims asserted by the Plaintiff.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roberts Construction Company v. VondriskaWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Central Montana Stockyards v. FraserMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Wyuta Cattle Co. v. ConnellWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hutchins v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Raun v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API