Legal Opinion

Geaminea v. Nebraska

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided June 25, 1962No. Civ. No. 526 LPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN PELT, District Judge.

This matter is before the court upon a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. A hearing has been held and counsel have submitted briefs, and the matter is now ready for determination. The hearing was held pursuant to an order of the court directing Respondent to show cause why the writ should not issue, and the parties have agreed that all the pertinent facts were produced and that a hearing such as specified in 28 U.S.C.A. § 2243 is now unnecessary.

Petitioner is currently an inmate at the Nebraska State Penitentiary serving a seven year sentence imposed by the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Smith v. O'GRADYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Smith v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & ParolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shupe v. SiglerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1964
  2. Noble v. SiglerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1964
  3. Lovedahl v. North CarolinaDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1965
  4. Arthur Geaminea v. The State of Nebraska, EtcCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API