Legal Opinion

Furlong v. Northwestern Casket Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 26, 1934No. 29,633PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEVANEY, Chief Justice.

Certiorari to the industrial commission. .

There is substantially no dispute about the facts. For some 19 years William Furlong, respondent, had been in the employ of the Northwestern Casket Company. On March 7, 1927, he suffered an accidental injury arising out of the course of his employment. He was then 71 years of age. Subsequent to the accident the Northwestern Casket Company and its insurer, Columbia Casualty Company, both relators herein, paid respondent 300 weeks’ compensation in the sum of $3,980.34 and hospital and medical expenses in the sum of $766.08.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. Excelsior Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Duprey's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McSpadden v. Big Ben Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. Eagle Indemnity Co. v. HadleyArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Casey v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Ohlsen v. J. G. Dill Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Henry v. D. A. Odell Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API