Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hall

Philadelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions

Decided July 1, 1926No. 48Published

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, J.,

When the above ease was called for trial, the defendant, through his counsel, expressly waived a trial by jury, whereupon the trial judge proceeded to hear the testimony without a jury, and at the conclusion of the testimony adjudged the defendant guilty of the charge on which he had been indicted, namely, assault and battery, and to which he had pleaded not guilty. The defendant has now filed a motion for a new trial on the ground that his waiver was ineffective, in that he could be lawfully tried only by a jury.

It might be argued that the motion should be refused on the ground…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Thompson v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API