Foster v. Prince
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The action was brought to enforce a ni&te-rialman’s lien. Code, § 8832 et seq.
Defendant pleaded the general issue in short, etc.
On the trial the verdict of the jury was; ‘We, the jury, find the issue in favor of the plaintiff and assess the damages at the sum of $162.83.” It was silent as to the lien. Thereupon the court rendered a personal judgment against defendant for the debt as per the verdict.
This was in November, 1930. In May following the plaintiff filed a motion to amend the judgment nunc pro tunc “according to the evidence had at the hearing of said cause,” so as to declare a lien…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sewall v. GliddenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1840
- Goldstein v. LeakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
- Bedsole v. PetersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Lee v. Campbell's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1836
- Sanitary Plumbing Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith & Gaston Funeral Directors, Inc. v. DeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. HannonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945
- Cumens v. GarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Penney v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Mundy v. AllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.