Legal Opinion
Behrmann v. Behrmann
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 27, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not err by including in the judgment language authorized by Uniform Rules for Trial Courts (22 NYCRR) § 202.50 (b) (see, 22 NYCRR, subtit D, ch III, subch B) that defendant’s maintenance obligation was exclusive of extraordinary medical or dental expenses and extraordinary repairs to the marital residence. A party retains the right to petition the court for payment of extraordinary expenses over and above normal maintenance and child support (see, Waterman v Waterman, 160 AD2d 865, 867; Dapolito v Dapolito, 150 AD2d…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ackley v. AckleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Reingold v. ReingoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Spano v. O'HaraNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Lieberman v. LiebermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Dapolito v. DapolitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boughton v. BoughtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Cordell v. CordellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Schafer v. SchaferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Dougherty v. DoughertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997