Legal Opinion

Rochetti v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 14, 1997No. 96-2032PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this Anders appeal, the trial court orally imposed “standard costs” without any reference to authority or amount. The probation order included $250 for investigative costs and $150 for law enforcement investigative costs. There is no oral or written request in the record for such costs, no documentation to support the costs, and no finding of Ro-ehetti’s ability to pay these costs. The costs were imposed without compliance with section 939.01, Florida Statutes (1995) and must be stricken. See Adams v. State, 676 So.2d 541 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Golden v. State, 667 So.2d 933 (Fla. 2d DCA…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Golden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API