Legal Opinion

Jewell v. Trilby Mines Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 16, 1915No. Nos. 4470, 4471PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Colorado; Robert E. Lewis, Judge. Suits by Nellie A. Brene Jewell and others against the Trilby Mines and another and against the Moose Gold Mining Company. From a decree dismissing the bills, plaintiffs appeal. ‘

1Opinion of the Court

VAN VALKENBURGH, District Judge.

October 18, 1913, in cause No. 4470, appellants brought against all the above-named appellees a bill of complaint, entitled “a bill to quiet-title and for accounting,” whereby they sought to establish their right and title to an undivided one-half interest in and to a certain piece of mining property known and described as the Ben Harrison lode and mining claim, and to an undivided'one-third interest in and to a certain piece of mining property known and described as the Moose lode and mining claim. January 20, 1914-, a hearing was had on motions of appellants…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Badger v. BadgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Kelley v. BoettcherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  4. Munson v. MarksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  5. Swift v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of Colorado v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  2. Cooper v. Ohio Oil Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1938
  3. Martin v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API