Legal Opinion

Poteat v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 17, 2003No. 94,2003PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

The defendant-appellee, Raheem Poteat (“Poteat”), was convicted, following a jury trial in the Superior Court, of three counts of Robbery in the First Degree, three counts of Possession of a Firearm During the Commission of a Felony (“PFDCF”) related to the robbery charges, three counts of Aggravated Menacing, and three counts of PFDCF related to the menacing charges. At trial, Poteat requested that the menacing charges and the related PFDCF charges be merged with the robbery charges and the PFDCF charges related to the robbery. The trial judge declined to merge the offenses.

I…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. LeCompte v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Nance v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  2. Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
  3. State v. FletcherSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  4. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
  5. Buchanan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API