Legal Opinion

Wilkinson v. McManus

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 29, 1974No. 44235PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, who is incarcerated at the state prison, appeals from the district court’s order denying his petition for either a writ of habeas corpus or an injunction. His petition challenged the constitutionality of the Minnesota prison labor program, under which a prisoner receives a small amount of compensation for each day that he works plus a certain amount of time off from his sentence for each month that he works at his prison job “with diligence and fidelity” and otherwise conducts himself properly. See, Minn. St. 243.18 and 243.23. As we interpret it, the petition was addressed to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robert Draper v. B. J. Rhay, as Superintendent of Washington State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. Maurice Sigler v. Vincent R. LowrieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zachary Morgan v. Edwin J. Lavallee, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Trigg v. TriggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API