Legal Opinion

Wood v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 406

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 27, 1983No. G80-742 CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENJAMIN F. GIBSON, District Judge.

This matter was originally filed in Kent County, Michigan, Circuit Court seeking damages and equitable relief against the defendants. The plaintiffs alleged that the duty of fair representation owed them by the union was breached during the events leading up to the transfer of certain property from Kroger to Hamady, that Kroger breached the collective bargaining agreement into which it had entered with the union, and that Hamady should be bound by the then-existing collective bargaining agreement pursuant to a successors and assigns clause in the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grider v. MoninDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1986
  2. Woods v. Dunlop Tire Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1987
  3. King v. Fox Grocery Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API