Legal Opinion
Local P-9, United Food & Commercial Workers International Union v. George A. Hormel & Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 18, 1984No. Civ. 4-83-683PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff seeks to vacate an “amended” arbitration award and confirm an “original” arbitration award. Defendant seeks an order affirming the amended award of the arbitrator. Plaintiffs motion will be granted.
FACTS
Plaintiff Local P-9, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union is the exclusive bargaining representative for the unit of production and maintenance employees at defendant Geo. A. Hormel & Company’s meatpacking plant in Austin, Minnesota. The collective…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- La Vale Plaza, Inc., a New York Corporation v. R. S. Noonan, Inc., a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Grudem Brothers Co. v. Great Western Piping Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between A/s Siljestad, and Hideca Trading, Inc., and Cross-Petitioner-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Local P-9, United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, AFL-CIO v. George A. Hormel & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Local P-9 v. George A. Hormel & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Ozark Air Lines, Inc. v. National Mediation BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985